Good idea! Send them to prison, then add part of the sentence, they must go out and plant 250 thousand trees.

What was in the article, tldr?

That’s a bit vindictive. They probably didn’t pick the software or didn’t even know how it worked.

The idiots that did, and that trusted the facial recognition without verification, the company that made it (if it made false claims), those look more like the ones responsible.

You don’t need to hack the quantum sensor. You’ll hack the regular computer around the sensor.

I wish they could do something like first offence, 10% of your annual revenue for the next 10 years goes to restitution efforts. Second offence, it’s 30% plus the govt. gets to set a CEO and the top management for a year. Thrd strike and the company is shut down and liquidated and the board members or any big stockholders never get to work in that industry again.

Who will lose money?

You’re right, I think most of the Western world politics is too dependent on the capital and that is dependent on the US markets. When the entire thing crashes, it’s going to be bad. I’m pretty sure I’ll be among those people affected, I’m in software, working (remotely) for an US firm. That was after recently losing my job due to failed investment. My wife’s job just got “restructured” as well, and it’s the second time in three years as well.

Not sure how we’ll deal. I should be making plans on what to do when I lose the house and everything else. I kinda know it but I’m not sure what can I do.

Why collaborate with Britain? That’s basically just going back to giving everything to us again, without getting much in return? Talking about that missile program in the article.

And if they do misdiagnose one in five patients, well, they shouldn’t have gotten infected, it’s their fault.

I would hardly call this dropping a hammer, though. I mean, the article itself says that OpenAI was lobbying for stuff like this.

For one, I don’t think it’s addressing any of the most troublesome problems. No mention of environmental impact. No mention of societal impact, or economic one. Nobody is addressing the horrible misuse of LLMs in, say education or biases that are built into the LLMs.

For two, what are the consequences? Sam Altman can go around saying whatever the hell he wants, mislead the government, the public, even their own users. No consequences. They can use bait and switch, no problems. The worst thing they can get is a few million dollars of fines. That’s for the long time been just the cost of doing business.

It’s a fig leaf law that doesn’t look at any of the worst problems we have but the worst offenders can use it to say “no wait we’re regulated”.

Hell, if you did that, you could make a 100 billion IPO, with today’s market.

Are you people?

I also never saw a calculation that took into amount my VPS costs. The fckers scrape half the internet, warming up every server in the world connected to the internet. How much energy is that?

Actually that usually is how it works. Unfortunately.

*Too big to fail" was probably made up by the big ones.

So the initiative here is the initiative itself.

Your city can probably afford it, but some can’t, or won’t. Initiatives like this get the ball rolling.

Yeah, but I like the “two weeks” one better, it waits at least four days until the next popup. The other one, the lil X, waits like four minutes

“abusive spouse” funny way to spell "government and “techbros”

I think it’s because the average person doesn’t understand about five words in your first sentence. They can understand marketing bull that they’re fed, though.

On a tangent, to me as an outsider it seems that most Americans are more likely to view anything as negative. I have no scientific backing for my shitpost though.