

Shun the technology and lose out on growth feel the JOMO (Joy of Missing Out).
There, fixed it for you.


Shun the technology and lose out on growth feel the JOMO (Joy of Missing Out).
There, fixed it for you.


Whatever’s the outcome, the anthropomorphization in that message stinks 🤮


And don’t stop there!
Add badges to songs (or options to not play them at all) if genAI was used during its creation.


Funny how the “Top Economist” just parroted what Ed Zitron, also quoted on the piece, has been harping on, since… checks notes always.
Edit: Zitron, the name. Not Zitrone, The German word for lemon.


That ough to be one of the laziest genAI slop images for a “Chinese router with a backdoor”.
Damn, it’s bad.


Top reasons I love PCIe NVMe storage:
Sure thing, if I need to add/replace/remove one it is a bigger hassle and probably involves removing the GPU as well, but it is rare for me to need to do that, so I prefer the simplicity of doing away with SATA.


What a choice of words… 🤦 Deliberate? “Better”? How about “worse” instead?


Why?
Google added that it doesn’t believe its own Gemini models were used, but still has “high confidence” an AI model was part of discovering the vulnerability and weaponizing an exploit.
No, really, why? If Google itself or their models didn’t discover the vulnerability, how would they know genAI was used on the discovery of the vulnerability and weaponization (interestingly, not “creation”) of an exploit?


The headline (as in AI replacing jobs) is as real as the CRAP (Computer Rendered Artificial Picture) it uses.


I think it might be very hard for AI-pilled leadership to back off from their claims and AI mandates and it would not help the hype that they might be banking on/profiting from.


Since they’re using (now expensive) genAI and productivity isn’t improving, because it almost never does, rhen they need to do something to appease stakeholders and offset the cost of using genAI, ofc.
That and keeping employee’s perception of power and self worth down, so they keep working their asses off in the hopes of not being the next in line.


Andreas Kling’s ladybird? Don’t wanna touch that with a 10ft pole.
https://hyperborea.org/reviews/software/ladybird-inclusivity/


I have a service that pings the server:
cat <<EOF | sudo tee /etc/systemd/system/ping-smb.service
[Unit]
Description=Blocks until pinging 192.168.1.10 succeeds
After=network-online.target
StartLimitIntervalSec=0
[Service]
Type=oneshot
ExecStart=ping -c1 192.168.1.10
Restart=on-failure
RestartSec=1
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
EOF
sudo systemctl enable ping-smb.service
And then I make the fstab entry depend on it:
x-systemd.requires=ping-smb.service


Did you check the sample video?
It doesn’t look good. And these shorts are probably cherry picked:


With a fine of ~$27 million, I think they’ll just pretend to be working on it, get the “good guys, complying with legislation and opening up the platform”, not do it (or at least, not in any satisfactory way), and pay the fine, if it gets applied.


Oh no!
Do I need to have 12 coasters? Well, no. But I didn’t need the 8 ones I already have either, and Steve keeps pumping out bangers like this, so…


Love how it highlights that big tech (much to capitalism’s fault, TBH) can only drive innovation if the tech has a moat around it, if no one else can, or would, copy it and deploy it at a lower cost.
Which is… the argument that people use to defend capitalism? That capitalism drives innovation and makes it accessible to everyone at the lowest possible price.
I like the frugal tech idea as much as I like degrowth.


Damn stupid me! Once again thought this was #goodnews


Probably yes.
And probably due to EU mandating new phones to be supported for longer.
https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/smartphones-and-tablets_en
Thanks for ruining it for me now.