Not surprising.
Their solution to everything LLM has been to add intermediary LLMs to manage the one we interact with to add “guardrails” or point them to a calculator.
It shouldn’t be surprising that they utterly fail at basic tasks on their own.
They’ve been doing that for over a decade now.
Its not “early days”.
Early days for AI models was a decade ago.
If they’re saying “we need to regulate new development”.
Then potentially they realized that the tech their entire scam is based on has hit its cap so now they’re pulling the ladder up behind them.
Yeah, this has been for a while now.
When Digital Extremes made and hosted their own wiki for Warframe instead of the fandom one, you had to directly search the main page of their wiki from Google instead of just searching.
No you are not.
Per the article, all three LLMs ran the same test by the same third party company.
In this scenario it does exactly what it is told to do.
That was my experience growing up at the time.
That’s my lived experience when myself and my friends all chose to stop using NN. It is irrelevant if you believe me or not as that is the truth.
Eh, Internet Explorer beat out Netscape because the latter was incredibly bloated and could take dozens(plural) of minutes to boot.
If you wanted something done quick, if you tried IE you’d be done and moved on by the time Netscape loaded; even if once it loaded it was faster at loading pages.
“Think of the game devs needing to make money”
Says the former dev whose biggest success, Unreal Tournament, had little to do with Epic itself.
And Fortnite started as a Pubg clone.
Based on my understanding:
The glasses would send data to the user’s phone, which would maintain the local end of a bank of faces, and relay that to a central server for full id.
Similar to how Facebook builds profiles on you across the web on connected sites regardless of whether you are logged into Facebook.
I was using a set of template files designed for LLMs to review that project. It is absolutely the fault of Claude that it tools me to do something one way, then told me to try another and when I reverted it said it was the optimal approach.
Where I find it helps is in getting initial starts and as a start to code review. But in both cases they aren’t ever operating on their own and their feedback is filtered through myself or another senior dev.
My first use of Claude this week, for code reviews only(since no LLM can be trusted to write a user story or test suite), had it gaslight me.
It marked down my code for using a specific practice to make some xml safer and easier to read.
When I tried things its way, it wanted me to change it back.
They’re “talking to leadership”
Which entails wining and dining them, taking them on vacations and outright giving them money until they see things the corporate way
Within reason. It needs to be protected from those who would destroy it, those who would loot it, those who would vandalize it and nature itself from eroding it.
It is the first known permanent city, it is a monumental thing.
From the ongoing excavations, last I heard is that they found each dwelling had its own store of foraged wild grains
Anthropic is doing what OpenAI did for chat GPT5.
China isnt leading this.
Canada has been flying electric commercial aircraft for 7 years now