

Well one was a honey pot the other two people under direct coercian because he was their boss.
So honestly the only evidence that he had any game was the wife he cheated on


Well one was a honey pot the other two people under direct coercian because he was their boss.
So honestly the only evidence that he had any game was the wife he cheated on


I hope she gets seduced by some hot women too tbh


“wow you dont like me shootinh you with my death ray? This anti-tech sentiment is really getting out of hand.”


Honestly this is a sad point. The SBC trend was going ti remarkly small idle power comsumption.


Kind of a double fuck in these rollouts at the moment. 1. Is the reckless build out. All the things you mentioned. 2. Is the explicit goal of using to shoot working class power, and create “algorythimc governace” and “ubiquitous policing”.
Its a sinister combo


I can. Compute is compute. Even if it’s extremely niche you give me enough cycles I’ll find something to run on it.
There is a geniuly cool idea floated a last year I think at xorg conf for a Linux driver that used GPGPU instructions to do the traditional GPU processing as well. So theoretically you could use some of the AI accell to instead compute things like rastors.


A few rounds of layoffs seem to have changed some of the mind of people I know so far


So glad, we the public, bought all of those shares and really set them on a healthy course…/s


Hey I’m rooting for the guy. If in two years they release this mostly generated code it should be entirely public domain. Public domain slop is better for me then hostage making spyware.


If the charges are true, I mean yeah. Kind of regardless of race. Do you have reason to believe she isn’t loyal to her country and wouldnt act in its interest?


Starlink needing a subsidy for launches is only because they are operating as a monopoly. Competitors get flights just fine without it


SpaceX and Starlink should have to be broken up. xAI’s purchase by SpaceX never should have been allowed. The contracts for NASA should have always required ownership of the investments made and the amount of rented tech never should have been allowed critical mass. Starlink should have been allowed a monopolistic ownership of its spots in space and should have been for forced to create an open interoperability standard from the jump.
The fact that “SI” is how SpaceX is talking about those AI projects shows they are very much still a government contractor even in this phase, just looking at different pots of money. Contracts that Musk’s massive ties to corruption should be viewed as last resort, at least until they cut him out of the company (while he is charged and tried for his corruption).


You take that back or I’ll make a mean toot /s


But they are just different entraces to the same “public square”: the fediverse


Add a “AI Slop” feature in the reviews to track that. Let publishers flag games built on their IP. Give the store front some feature options for both.
The flag one should probably have a verification system and trust system to prevent IP trolling though. Reviews should probably also have rep system to weight reviews to tbh


Tenets and beliefs


I like the idea that using inferior AI is opposed. Another Transhumanist argument that seems totally fair to me, is that the goal of the current AI technology is to create sentient life by creating convincing enough interactions to make them indistigushiable from human interactions. This makes the most likely scenario one in which we create a living thinking being on par of humans but create systems of intentional slavery around them.
We aren’t there yet for me, but should enslaving a person really be a matter of taste?


“Thank you CUSTOMER for your interest in PRODUCT. You interest is not only smart but actually sets you on path to revolutionize MARKET SEGMENT.”


“sandbox” with no wood walls or sand
“The rich fuck all of us, but some more then others.”