Yes, but this particular abusive feature is a result of misguided legislation, not profit-seeking.

all that invested money vanishes

Well it’s mostly going directly to the hardware vendors (Nvidia) and infrastructure providers (Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud et al.).

This guy is a sex pest.

What’s best for the website owners is to have people actually visit and interact with their website. Blocking AI tools is consistent with that.

Please give more funding money, it’s only 10 years away UwU

Capitalism.

TD?

Is it because the 1s get stuck in the bends in the pipe, but the nice round 0s can get around the corners more easily?

“no file size limit” sounds like a challenge…

The supported hardware/targets with Debian 13.0 on RISC-V include the SiFive HiFive Unleashed, SiFive HiFive Unmatched, Microchip Polarfire, and the VisionFive 2 and other JH7110 SoC platforms. Plus QEMU can work with Debian RISC-V as an emulated/VM target. Other RISC-V single board computers may work fine with Debian 13.0 if resorting to using their vendor kernels. Support for additional boards in the future may come to Debian 13 via Trixie-Backports.

FIFO if you know what i mean 💩

How old is your account?

no

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic

What’s their margin? Are they profitable?

LLM’s produce fan-fiction of reality.

From the sidebar:

If possible, when submitting please delete the “m.” from “en.m.wikipedia.org”. This will ensure people clicking from desktop will get the full Wikipedia website.

Imagine not being American and having to read about the American soap opera in your technology community and everywhere else.

Don’t get high on your own supply.

This forbes blog is about this article:

https://cybernews.com/security/billions-credentials-exposed-infostealers-data-leak/

The only silver lining here is that all of the datasets were exposed only briefly: long enough for researchers to uncover them, but not long enough to find who was controlling vast amounts of data. Most of the datasets were temporarily accessible through unsecured Elasticsearch or object storage instances.

So there isn’t really an explanation other than “somebody collected these somehow and left the data unsecured.”

The attack vector for infostealer malware is usually social engineering, getting unwary users to download infected trojanized software via phishing and malvertising etc.

If you follow security news, you will see articles about infostealer malware campaigns all the time.

https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/18/minecraft_mod_malware/

https://thehackernews.com/2025/06/malicious-pypi-package-masquerades-as.html

https://thehackernews.com/2025/06/rust-based-myth-stealer-malware-spread.html

https://thehackernews.com/2025/05/eddiestealer-malware-uses-clickfix.html