They are. Media companies push for that image

See it’s not though and that’s part of my point. Accurately scaling your operation is a huge part of that bang for your buck goal.

Feeding 1000 people three times a day seven days a week. It becomes a fuck it number. I couldn’t probably waste food in that instance anything I have will likely be devoured in three or four days tops.

A family of four is a tighter budget and operation. Food waste becomes a lot more likely and certain items can’t be reused. If I make a bunch of turkey I can reuse that meat for other dishes. Whereas scrambled eggs I really can’t.

So when it comes to a 1000 people fuck it scramble the eggs they’ll eat them. When it comes to a family of 4 that one bird can become three or even four meals and instead of scrambled eggs I can probably use those eggs in a different way to elongate their shelf life. It requires more control and finer tuning which is actually much more difficult in many ways.

They’re almost different logistical issues entirely and requiring different tuning. Which is why it becomes the logistical nightmare that it is, it can feel unpredictable and unreasonable to a lot of people

I’m actually a chef or like make food professionally hot. And one thing I’ve super learned from the industry is logistics and both the cost of it in terms of labor, product attainment, storage. Whatever shit

Historically also kitchens/cooks were a huge part of military logistics for obvious reasons and the brigade style kitchen people run today stems from that.

So I think for people they don’t look at cooking as the logistical nightmare that it is, they see the act of make food hot. You wanna buy local, in season, learn ways to store food and utilize as much as possible with little waste to maximize not just general cost but also you make that food last longer. I think someone would benefit a fucking lot making a YouTube channel with this stuff in mind. Not how to make delicious food but how to organize it. Marie Kondo your kitchen basically.

Also the best food is peasant food because historically they had to be the absolute best at the aforementioned logistical nightmare. Chefs can go from the shittiest holes in society to the top solely on their ability to master logistics.

I’m high so I ranted but I find this sorta stuff so interesting and personally something I wish I could do to help people get access to food and financial comfort.

Cooking? I think it’s just more skill based than people think because it’s not just making food hot.

I think consciousness is just a human construct to be honest.

Marge is calling

Like what thinking

Like what? I feel like in my day there would’ve been some serious outbursts

Like a skinwalker or something

Who reads the articles? You’d have to go to another site. Nobody does that

Why do you even use these? I never understood the point.

Lol okay buddy.

AI is literally a fantastic pattern recognition technology and has the ability to take complex information and visualize it in ways a human mind cannot. Those are pretty useful.

Not sure how you think what he’s doing is critihype. Never put any words in your mouth. Don’t understand why the headline, Bernie didn’t write, has to be changed when everything he said is pretty true.

You did imply AI is useless you literally just reaffirmed that calling it boring. Never jumped to any conclusion, the conclusion I came to was that your perspective is goofy and literally matches the AI is both bad and dangerous. A bubble is dangerous.

Because they’re saying dumb things and unfortunately holding hands and being shy about someone’s straight lack of thinking doesn’t really get people to see the point. The comments in this section state:

• Bernie is both not doing his job(he is) and benefitting from this/AI

-AI is both bad and worthless but also dangerous and Bernie is dumb for trying to do anything (complete fallacy of the weak/dangerous threat kind, the enemy is both weak but dangerous. Silly)

-Absolutely fake claims like the one above.

So the whole comment section is just rife with stupidity. Stupid isn’t even a bad word.

Back to what you said. I literally don’t understand why you act like it says stock changes anything or anything about what I said? Literally useless points you keep highlighting. Nothing is made more clear by whatever you’re trying to say.

Donald Trump already had the upper hand he doesn’t care about the rule of law. Dunno why you’re viewing this like game of thrones.

Bernie Sanders wants the wealth amassed by these AI companies which have stolen data and work of billions of people across generations to be handed back to the people. His strategy is to tax the STOCK (not sure why we’re bolding it but sure I’ll play along). He is following the regular ruling that stands for creating panels, legislative bodies, committee establishment process. The president nominates THE SENATE CONFIRMS(because you glossed over that part) this is literally the standard practice.

So I don’t understand what you think you’re making clear or how what he’s doing is wrong here. He’s following the rules and wants to tax the stock of companies that have taken advantage of Americans. It literally makes complete sense and is nothing like what the comment above claims.

The comment above suggests the government will own the stock? Or something ridiculous and Bernie wants to give that power to the president. Which is what I imagine an insane person’s interpretation of that article might be if they didn’t know anything about government functions or something. So in conclusion, it’s a very stupid interpretation.

Again, I literally don’t understand what you’re saying. Not because what you’re saying doesn’t make sense but the conclusion you’re drawing and your interpretation is absurd.

You are not only not right, you’re not even wrong.

Yes they work to hype tech for investors. No Bernie is not perpetuating anything by saying this that’s just so silly. AI genuinely will be used and make money and this tech isn’t going to disappear, it does have value not this much value but it’s genuinely cutting edge and will likely be in many industries. Bernie has no political or personal interest in that, he is stating the lawlessness and recklessness of this tech needs to be roped in by the government which is his job.

I literally don’t understand how you got to your conclusion that AI tech is useless and Bernie is supporting it by saying this. It’s just the thinking of someone whose brain has been rotted by the idea that AI=BAD.

Why is he even bothering to do his job if he’s struggling to do his job? He should just be shitty and useless like the others! /S

Yeah why should he do his job why isn’t he just being useless like the rest! /S

This isn’t playing into anyone’s hand I don’t understand what the hell you’re saying lol

Dumb comment.

Yes Bernie Sanders the notorious stock manipulator.