

How could speech violate IP law?


How could speech violate IP law?


That would be all the books.


So United stopped denying care?


I mean, we should certainly take the time to learn our rights, but I wouldn’t say that it’s ridiculous to not remember everything contained in 40+ pages.


Realistically, it’s both.


Donald Trump holding government office in USA is wildly unconstitutional too.


Oh no! Anyway…


Where do their messages still say private? I’ve not seen that in years. The initialism “PM” seemed to get replaced by “DM” overnight. Also though, many of them didn’t lose privacy. Anyone, at the very least in USA, younger than the Patriot Act never had privacy to begin with.


It makes sense with the context in the article, but “triples that of 650 million” is a very strange way to say “almost 2 billion”.
They’re under the protection of the POTUS. Yes, they feel immune to consequences.


I originally saw it as somebody using 2 different symbols for the 2 different sounds that “th” can make. That at least makes sense. Simply replacing the letters with one character (one not on a standard keyboard, btw) regardless of which sound they make is just extra effort for the sake of it.


I just looked up VirtuaGirl, and apparently it’s still a thing. Looks like someone even had it running through wine several years ago.


So bags of popcorn should be avoided like the plague, unfortunately.
Unfortunately? Popcorn is the least flavorful thing in existence. Just find some other bland edible material and put your toppings on that instead.


Nazis, I imagine.
Then you have to either assume it’s accurate which is a damn bold assumption, or you have to read through it yourself to know anyway.