Just like this “bubble” has supposedly been about to pop for years.

This is lemmy, balanced takes are not allowed.

Lemmy has, the public has not.

Or so people have been saying for the past 3 years.

Probably cause it’s a dumb comment, you people see conspiracies everywhere.

Except you’re part of the tiny minority that saw this and even tinier minority that cares. You’re not even a rounding error.

Sir this is lemmy. Most people here just follow whatever the echo chamber tells them to. Thinking or referencing reality is typically not advised.

Honestly if they hired someone who refuses to use AI in 2026 it’s on them.

That “AI” is a completely dumbed down one with reasoning disabled. Of course it’ll make stuff up.

Lemmy is the wrong place to be if you want nuance. Most people here aren’t accustomed to thinking for themselves.

What scheme, their last models have been so much better than OpenAI’s it’s no surprise people are moving to Claude.

Look at the public numbers, it seems true. Copilot on your taskbar is just windows being garbage, not the AI being bad. Just look at self-hosted AI and measure the power costs of your queries. It’s tiny.

Limit it per household/IP and block VPNs. You people really have no imagination.

I’ve started using it due to some recommendation from other people on here (as opposed to z-lib, libgen) and noticed there are quite a few low-quality books that sneak in. We’re talking broken TOC, bad OCR, unclosed spans, etc… It’s obviously great as an archive, it has more than any other site, combined. But I can’t see myself using it for most books anymore. Could be a user issue though.

Is annas better than z-lib?

Because they don’t put the effort in.

Add a simple “the video isn’t served until the ad’s length has elapsed” and suddenly your only workaround is to spend 30s staring at a black screen.

I suppose it could be considered a trade-off? There’s the obvious advantages of longevity and possible size(?), it van still be viable in some niche uses where that matters. Github’s code vault from a while back could have benefited from that.

This is explicitly stated to be for cold storage though. It doesn’t have to be fast at all. And they’re supposedly aiming for 500mbps soon.

Did you read the article? 30mbps is faster than a lot of people’s internets. It’s not fast, but for a prototype, it’s not bad.

I have no clue what you’re trying to say.

If I ask an AI to write an email and it does so both better and faster than I could, how can you say it’s inconvenient and doesn’t save time?