Answer: confidentiality of the vote

Disagree. The AI will say things like taxing the rich more or preserve nature etc. Society won’t listen to that, or more precisely won’t follow this advice, because the deciders do not like this idea.

Why is this down voted? It is essentially true. Source: I work in ml/hpc

Maybe Staatsoberhaupt. I would translate it as “leader”. But given how illegitimate his reign was, it is still a bit to soft.

I’ve only seen a fraction. Did it end with a global environmental catastrophe? That was ignored because of profit?

This sounds like a misunderstanding of gdpr to me?

I’m dumbfounded. I’d be furious if it took more than 20 seconds

What happened to ankor?