Your point seems valid up until you realize that 99% of the developers this scenario matches are just making clones and games that they will never get beyond early release. To me the issue is less the tool they use and more the tool they are.
The issue is that the tool enables those dumbasses to get considerably farther in the development process. Meaning now the near endless masses of dumbasses can flood the market with low quality garbage. There’s a reason a barrier to entry has value. For every diamond in the rough indie developer there are now a thousand slop generators just as capable of releasing a game.
Depends on your expectations regarding results. If I asked a friend what they ate last night and they provided a cookbook review and a link to Amazon I would deem that a cagey response. Like, just answer the fucking question.
Listen, conservatives haven’t been working tirelessly for decades to erode American education just to have someone on the internet give the credit to the outcomes they cultivated…
That’s why he does it. To distract.
…so you are saying their verification process is so broken that hundreds of thousands of people had to appeal a false reading. Broken and insecure, what a look.
Wait, what? Does this mean when AI told me I was insightful and right over and over about everything I typed in… it was just to make me want to continue to use it?.. How could this be?
Can they, though? According to the article their dumb boomer brains can’t remember how to play between gaming sessions. Does LoL give them a play tutorial every 15 minutes so they can enjoy gaming?
They don’t say this in the article…out loud. But it is mostly about how they have a large disposable income so it is 100% what they mean.
Neither have the large companies. The only difference between you and them is that you have acknowledged this loss of knowledge.
It kind does both, honestly.
…that someone is directly harming them and profiting off their stupidity while they actively thank the abuser? No, that doesn’t sound like MAGA people…
Yeah, the only thing missing from this article is that the title doesn’t end with “, as intended.”
No, common sense says that.
Absolutely not because of privacy concerns. But definitely not about a resources or time issue. This is them responding to the negative backlash without acknowledging their tone deaf Superbowl ad. If there was time or resource issue they wouldn’t have dropped tens of millions of dollars bragging about it.
I prefer brown pants
Also, please use copilot… please
The LLM comparison to a team of human developers is a great example. But like outsourcing your development, LLM is less a tool and more just delegation. And yes, you can dig in deep to understand all the stuff the LLM is delegated to do the same as you can get deeply involved with a human development team to maintain an understanding. But most of the time, the sell is that you can save time - which means you aren’t expecting to micro manage your development team.
It is a fractional CTO problem but the actual issue is that developers are being demanded to become fractional CTOs by using LLM because they are being measured by expected productivity increases that limit time for understanding.
Whoa whoa whoa… no one said let AI be the administrative assistant.
No, he was in a room with Tim Apple. I think Mr. Apple suggested Tim Cook to him, though.