

Two reasons:
- Prediction markets ARE gambling and need to be regulated as such before it has a chance to create victims or empower insider trading.
- My moral philosophy is to side with the underdog.


Two reasons:


"I lose $30,800 shame on me.
I lose $308,000 shame on you."
Hope he wins.


I missed the return of the big phones, but I suppose it’s possible that my hands have simply grown alongside the trends.


Ah yes, Gas Lights, beacons of health and safety those. /s


YES! GRILL THESE FUCKERS UNTIL THEIR NEXT PRIMARY!


Today, considerably less than, say, a year ago.
Every day it gets worse with you fuckin sloppers always slopping out garbage putting countless people and industries at risk with your worthless non-expertise. If you haven’t gotten the hint yet, I don’t respect you, you’ve already stated multiple lies to our faces in this discussion.


You do realise that most of those bugs and exploits aren’t from AI generated code (a good chunk has existed for years before LLMs were even a wet thought), and the number is mainly exploding because LLMs are being used to identify them, right?
I think that’s the lie you’re being fed, mate. Sure, some of these old existing exploits have been identified by these multibillion dollar tech companies, but we’ve well documented that AI slop coders produce terribly unsecure code and far more than their peers.


“Please shut the fuck up if you have no inkling about what you’re talking about.”
Oh I’m sorry did I not enter this discussion with enough civility?


IDGAF if a slopper is checking the slop. Since 2022 the number of bugs and exploits has exploded dramatically and code is measurably worse: because people do not understand code that they did not write.


When it was first invented it literally brought light to the streets and phased out TORCHES.
Do you understand what a TORCH is?


Eat my ass slopper


He let AI refactor his entire codebase because the team didn’t understand each other’s techniques/approach and nobody had any time or knowledge to do the work themselves. They literally did not understand how it worked so they asked the chatbot to redo it and now they still don’t understand it but it appears to them as if it was improved.
What did you read?


Unfortunately they maintain the main branch so we can only rename the forks. P.S. plz at me if we hear about an anti-AI Kernel Fork because I fully intend to install it myself.


What you’ve done is allowed an unethical and incompetent machine create an unmaintainable technical debt which will destroy the future of the codebase or the company, because you were all lazy.


Electricity allows us to perform otherwise impossible logistics, medical care, heating, countless beneficial technologies, and longer operation hours in industry.
Without AI… what? More jobs, cheaper utilities, lower polution? In the future it might be able to lie to you sightly more efficiently while funneling control of industry into the hands of a dozen wealthy elites.


Maybe it could explain to Sam how a statistical model cannot approximate 101% accuracy to the sample data.


“SAN FRANCISCO – March 17, 2026 – The Linux Foundation, the nonprofit organization enabling mass innovation through open source, today announced $12.5 million in total grants from Anthropic, AWS, GitHub, Google, Google DeepMind, Microsoft, and OpenAI to strengthen the security of the open source software ecosystem. The funding will be managed by Alpha-Omega and the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), trusted security initiatives within the Linux Foundation, to develop long-term, sustainable security solutions that support open source communities worldwide.”
Immediately after this announcement Linus was suddenly a lot less critical of AI.


For anybody confuse about why Torvalds is suddenly such a slopper it’s because AI companies pumped millions into the Linux Foundation which gives him a paycheck.
Hell, I’d use it if it wasn’t Chromium.